<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NAT on Holmq.dk</title><link>https://e41943f8.hugo-holmq-dk.pages.dev/tags/nat/</link><description>Recent content in NAT on Holmq.dk</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 13:59:59 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://e41943f8.hugo-holmq-dk.pages.dev/tags/nat/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>VPN with overlapping networks</title><link>https://e41943f8.hugo-holmq-dk.pages.dev/post/2023-08-28-pfsense-vpn-overlapping-networks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:19:48 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://e41943f8.hugo-holmq-dk.pages.dev/post/2023-08-28-pfsense-vpn-overlapping-networks/</guid><description>&lt;p>I recently needed to create a new site to site VPN, but there was a few challenges to this. First of all the router of the new site is behind NAT and it would be moved to other physical locations everynow and then. I needed something that works both behind NAT and initiates the connection, that&amp;rsquo;s when I started to think about wireguard. I have used wireguard in the past, so it wasn&amp;rsquo;t exactly new to me.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>